Saturday, November 29, 2025

“Where did the $10 Million Go?”

Former Edgewood Town Councilor and Mayor Pro Tem, John Abrams, found some interesting anomalies when looking into the town government’s performance on road improvements. In this follow-up letter submitted to nm.news, he asks some important questions. (Be sure to scroll down and read the two comments on his follow-up letter.)

Some historical context: In the run-up to the change of government, mail-in ballots-only election, the town government was the target of lawsuits, numerous IPRA requests, and allegations of financial wrongdoing by various proponents of the Commission/Manager form of government. In spite of the lawfare and vicious personal attacks launched against Former Mayor John Bassett, Councilor and Pro Tem John Abrams and Councilor Linda Holle, the audits were successfully completed, and IPRA requests were handled in-house. The numerous lawsuits which appear to have been intended to cripple the Mayor/Council government were only partially successful. 

Fast forward to 2025: the Commission/Manager government dissolved into factions almost immediately upon taking office in 2022, there is currently neither a Manager nor an Interim Manager in place, the town is not processing IPRA requests in a timely way, the audits are still not satisfactorily completed, and lawsuits continue to multiply.

In modern parlance, there seems to have been a whole lot of projection going on. For those who prefer dealing with local government issues within a framework of Christian values, it’s called sowing and reaping; sowing the wind and reaping the whirlwind. 

Another (in-house) lawsuit

One sitting Commissioner (Milligan) suing another soon to be former Commissioner (Anaya). Emails…again?!   

Friday, November 21, 2025

Letter: Leadership, infrastructure and the future of Edgewood

Having been away from Edgewood for a large part of the past few years, I was disappointed to return and find that many of our roads have not been getting timely maintenance and are in poor condition. My neighbors are complaining about road improvements taking place in places where there are few houses, while they eat dust year after year. However, if you watch the town meetings you will hear a series of  glowing reports on road  projects. When mis-steps are acknowledged, they are accompanied by a series of lame excuses. 

At what point will Edgewood residents demand that its town government stop the hype and start dealing with reality? Former Town Councilor and Mayor Pro Tem, John Abrams, offers his thoughts in a recent letter to nm.news. Abrams is one of a very small group of town officials in Edgewood’s relatively short history as an incorporated municipality who has the ability to think long term, and who doesn’t try to exploit the town for personal gain. As such he is not popular with Edgewood’s cargo cult faction. Nevertheless, at several critical points, Abrams has been called on for help when Edgewood’s flashy promoters failed to complete important projects.

Tuesday, November 11, 2025

Will the real Edgewood please stand up?

On my current reading list is Timelines of the East Mountains published by the East Mountain Historical Society. It can be ordered from them or purchased through several local businesses. The book chronicles the histories of many small communities which no longer exist in a legal sense, but whose residents laid the foundations for the East Mountain communities of today. Wind, weather and the departures of former residents have erased most of them, but faint impressions remain. 

When my family first moved to the area, there were still many residents willing to share their memories. Small towns such as Frost, Venus, and Hyer are mostly forgotten, but the names survive in street names or the occasional sign post. For many long-time residents of rural Santa Fe County who have been swallowed up by the legal entity d.b.a. Town of Edgewood, those memories persist.   

To my amusement, I discovered last week that there are still Edgewood residents other than my family who continue to speak of “going into” or “going down to” Edgewood. Prior to the formation of the town government, most residents of what is now Commission District-1 did not consider themselves to be part of Edgewood. Edgewood was the location of the Post Office, the elementary school, and a few small businesses clustered around the I-40 and NMSR 333 intersections. Smith’s, Walgreens, and the John Brooks supermarket had not yet appeared. It was a place we got our mail and drove through on our way to Moriarty, Cedar Crest, or Albuquerque. We lived in rural Santa Fe County. The aptly named Mike’s Friendly Store in Moriarty was a frequent destination. 

In the first few years after the town government’s incorporation, there were a few people who tried to make much of the old community of Venus. Some even enlisted volunteers to promote swapping the name Venus for Edgewood. However, it was a hard sell. When the people suggesting it were greeted with a local version of “Yankee go Home” they finally stood down.* After all, unlike the vanished towns in the region, Edgewood still had a post office and a small but recognizable cluster of businesses.   

Then, as now, the majority of Edgewood residents lived in the actual, historical Edgewood; they were not impressed by the suggestion. When the proponents finally realized that they needed votes from what has now become “lower Edgewood” in order to get elected, the attempts at re-branding Edgewood to Venus finally ceased. The physical remnants of Venus had been destroyed in a storm years before 1999 rendering the proposal incomprehensible to newer residents. Wally Gordon memorialized the name, if not its actual history, in his serial novel Venus Vector published in The Independent newspaper. 

Is any of this relevant to town government today? In one sense it is not. Edgewood is now defined by legal boundaries which are unlikely to change. However, for purposes of governance the historical fault lines still exist, and woe to government officials who fail to account for them. I have made several attempts to describe the situation by looking at the context of the 1999 Incorporation.  The higher than expected turnover rates in Edgewood’s town government persist, and are largely due to the local government’s failures to understand the ramifications of annexing so far beyond Edgewood’s informal, traditional boundaries. 

* After having attended some of the early “branding” meetings, I now avoid them. Most are the product of Edgewood’s recurring manic bouts of promotional activities coupled to a long series of groups all of which (for a fee) have promised a sure-fire method for giving Edgewood a cohesive brand or image. Because Edgewood has multiple narratives whose strands cannot easily be co-mingled, the projects seldom produce anything of lasting value. The meetings often feature hotly debated proposals many of which are not founded on anything resembling the truth. Unless you enjoy watching an unintentional community playhouse adaptation of Much Ado About Nothing, there are probably better ways to spend an evening.  

Friday, November 7, 2025

Special Meeting wrap-up for November 6, 2025

In yet another meeting consisting primarily of a closed session, the Town Commissioners voted to (1) advertise the position of Town Manager for 14 days with extensions made if needed. They also (2) voted to reject an offer to settle the Berg lawsuit, and instead maintain the town’s “neutral” status. The Berg matter, which involves former Town Commissioner Jerry Powers, is one of two major legal messes in which the Town Commissioners have voted to spend public funds to meddle in private lawsuits. Town government has no business taking sides in HOA disputes. That goes double when one or more members of the Governing Body are parties to the dispute. This one could and should have been taken off the town’s books. If it continues past January 1, 2026 the expenses and trouble will only increase. (3) No action was taken on appointment of an interim manager which usually means that the Town Clerk becomes the statutory official in charge of administrative matters. 

Thursday, November 6, 2025

Edgewood Elections: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly

The Good:

  1. With more than 1,200 votes cast, interest in town government is continuing its upward trend from a low point in 2014. 
  2. The beginning of 2026 will likely see a Commission/Manager government Version 3.0 featuring  new faces on the Town Commission and possibly on the Town staff.  
  3. The “two-minute-hate” rituals launched against an incumbent candidate via social media failed to convince a majority of voters this year.

The Bad: The town is still reeling from a series of poor decisions made in 2022 with regard to legal issues, hiring policies, and setting priorities.  With most of those responsible now gone, the Town Commission has an opportunity to refocus its attention. My suggestions: 

  1. Hire a new manager from outside the town and instruct that person to make a priority of getting the financial problems in order beginning with the yearly audits. 
  2. Hire fresh legal counsel: Instruct them to begin the process of ending the town’s participation in private legal disputes, and begin a policy of asking for “best practices” legal advice whenever possible. This is especially important to protect the Planning & Zoning Commission from repeating the problems that board has encountered over the past year. 
  3. Third, they need to look at the proliferation of feel-good projects and committees and re-focus on essential government functions. It was unfair to burden town staff with so many non-essential tasks and then blame them for neglecting essential functions. 
  4. Make having (or working on obtaining) AICP certification a condition of employment for managing the Planning & Development department. Provide incentives for assistants in the department to do so as well. 
  5. The decision to turn over selection of road improvement projects to town staff was preferable to the cronyism exhibited in the selection process from 2022-2024, but the Town Commission needs to return to establishing an overall policy which balances the present number of residents served with long term needs when selecting projects. Allowing town employees to exercise some discretion within guidelines is appropriate. Turning the decisions over to staff entirely is not.
The Ugly: 
  1. There are still too many people in Edgewood exploiting social media as a means to promote political agendas by using the various platforms to spread gossip, unfounded rumors, and outright character assassination. 
  2. All too often in the past, such tactics have proven successful, and some of the worst offenders try to present their arguments citing religious or patriotic justifications. 
  3. Such use of social media paints Edgewood in a bad light, but it is preferable to the town’s early years when these individuals were conducting their whispering campaigns in local churches.
  4. Those who facilitate such behavior are as much a part of the problem as are the instigators.  

Tuesday, November 4, 2025

Edgewood Election Results 2025

For those who have asked; the New Mexico Secretary of State website has election results. If the District 1 race stays as close as earlier updates, expect delays if there is a mandatory recount.  

Update 10:44 pm: With 10 of 10 precincts fully reporting, the New Mexico Secretary of State website is showing for District 1 Commissioner Kenneth Brennan has retained his seat with 54% of the vote, and Commissioner Stephen Murillo, with 62% of the vote, has defeated the incumbent in his bid to represent District 4.

Monday, November 3, 2025

We were warned; five town managers in four years.

Former Mayor John Bassett called this one as soon as the change of government scheme was announced. By the end of 2025, the Commission/Manager government will have racked up five Town Managers in its first four years of existence with at least two, and as now seems likely, three interim managers. The two managers hired as regular appointments resigned unexpectedly. Finding someone willing and qualified to take on the job will be difficult: Edgewood’s Commission/Manager government has justly earned its reputation as a bad employer. 

Voters were promised something new and better. What we got was cronyism on steroids and a revolving door in the town office. When the going got tough, three of the original five Town Commissioners jumped ship. However, with some new faces on the Commission, a measure of stability appears to be returning. Whether or not the tentative improvements will continue depends on the outcome of tomorrow’s election.  

Town Managers to date:

  1. Kay Davis: Former town administrator appointed as interim following the swearing in of the five new Governing Body Commissioners pending hiring of a permanent manager.
  2. Scott Sensanbauer July 25, 2022-November 2022
  3. Jerret Perry-Acting Manager appointed upon the dismissal of Sensanbauer (November 2022-July 2023; served as interim pending the hiring of a permanent manager.)
  4. Nina McCracken was appointed in July 2023. She was the town’s longest serving Manager to date at the time of her resignation on October 28, 2025. 
  5. Appointment of an Interim Town Manager to be discussed at the November 6, 2025 Special Meeting of the Town Commission. ETA: In the absence of a Town Manager or formal appointment of an Interim Manager, the Town Clerk or that officer’s designee assumes responsibility for taking on the Manager’s role. It appears that the Town Commission does not intend to hire a Manager or formally appoint an Interim Manager until after the new Commission is sworn in.  

Sunday, November 2, 2025

Silly Season in Edgewood: Take 13

The 13th iteration of Silly Season in Edgewood is in its mopping up phase. Barring any tie votes in the two contested races, we should know the makeup of the new Town Commission by Wednesday November 5, 2025. True to form, the campaigns’ outer trappings feature colorful, upbeat signs and brochures counterbalanced by some nasty exchanges on social media. It appears that in this election cycle it is Commissioner Kenneth Brennan who is being singled out for abuse from Edgewood’s Whine & Cheese Brigade.

In some ways, the comparative visibility of social media is an improvement on the town’s early days when candidates dispatched surrogates to spread misleading or false allegations to small groups in church and civic groups. To their credit, the leadership of most local church groups have taken steps to discourage such behavior, and so now we see the spectacle played out live via the interwebz. 

Summary of candidates and districts:

District 5 (Southwest Edgewood): Michael E. Rariden, appointed to replace Sterling Donner, is unopposed. He will complete the final two years of Donner’s term.* The next election to represent that district, should the Commission/Manager government survive that long, will be in November 2027. 

District 2 (Northeast Edgewood): Another district with one candidate this year; Devon L. Taylor. His term will run for a full four years  two years to finish out the remainder of Powers’ second term. Since he is reputed to have taken sides in the litigation over the status of roads in the Airpark, it will be interesting to see how the Commission will deal with potential conflicts of interest. 

District 4 (Southeast Edgewood): Incumbent Filandro R. Anaya faces challenger Stephen M. Murillo who is currently representing District 2 having been appointed to replace Jerry Powers following his resignation. Murillo now seeks to represent District 4 where he resides.  

District 1 (North Edgewood including the so-called Bridge Annexation and Campbell Ranch): Incumbent Kenneth Brennan (Mayor) faces challenger Adrian L. Chavez, Sr. who formerly served as a Planning & Zoning Commissioner. 

District 3 (Central Edgewood): Currently represented by Patrick Milligan, Mayor Pro Tem, whose term has two more years to run.  

Municipal Judge: William White is unopposed for a four year term. 

* Persons appointed to fill a vacancy on the Governing Body serve only until the next regularly scheduled  municipal election.